View Single Post
  #39   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
nom=de=plume nom=de=plume is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Caracas on the Potomac

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:47:50 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:


Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent:
Stalin,
Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to kill 20
million Americans, etc.
LOL, Communists all. Historically, however, I'd point out that
Democracies are immune to communism. There are very few, perhaps three,
democracies that have been overthrown by communists, or from the left,
for that matter. Fascism, on the other hand, had been the death of
many,
many, democracies.

Here's a question for you, which country has overthrown more
democracies,
the USSR, or the USA? When you answer that, you may want to consider
which is the more violent, the left or the right.



It's sad that some people are unable to understand things in a historical
perspective to the point of making threats and causing violence. If
there's anything that scares me more than the threats against our elected
officials more, I can't think of it. Doesn't matter if the person is on
the right or the left of a debate. There's no excuse for threatening
violence. Comments like baby killer, and time to reload, and spitting on
people, and yelling expletives have no place in our society. I vehemently
disagree with the hubris of Stupak, but to wish him dead? I dislike Rush
more than I can say, but I would much rather patiently wait for him to
stroke out than call for violence, even though that's what he promotes. I
wouldn't spit on a dog I didn't like (and I don't like many) no less a
human being.


Welcome back!
I've done some work getting Walker Bay info together for you in
anticipation of your return. Too much info to post here.
Just e-mail me.
Oh. Hope your trip went well, and welcome back!
And I agree with what you said above.
Very perceptive. I appreciate your sensitivity in judging this type of
issue. Your legal training shines through.
Ok, enough. Don't want to appear too "gushing" in my praise.
Wouldn't be prudent.



Get a life.

--
Nom=de=Plume