On 08/03/2010 3:45 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:35:43 -0700,
wrote:

On 07/03/2010 11:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...


"Interest rates will definitely be higher." You must be an oracle. Duhh...
they're currently at historic lows, so that's not much of a leap in logic.

They can't go lower than zero.

Obama spent FAR less than Bush. Interesting how you right nuts forget about
the $10T in tax cuts for the rich and the Iraqi war's $6T.

Not as rate/time. For rate over time, Obama is debt-spending more than
4 times faster. By the end of 2010, 2 years, Obama will have debt spent
about the same as Bush did in 8 years.

to keep the US economy afloat. bush poured a TRILLION into iraq

what did that get us? any more jobs? more security? anything at all
for a TRILLION dollars?

And what do you think about Obama flushing $2 trillion in the first
year? And now another $1.6 trillion this year?

Don't forget democrates voted for Iraq too. And TARP.

"No money for healthcare." So, a public option or even better a single-payer
system would have 100s of billions. Nope, can't do that, right?

Eventually, when you can't pay for something you lose it. Just takes time.

which was already happening in healthcare, with double digit increases
over the last 10 years

Yep. Might be again. Work out home prices since about 1970 using the
government published inflation tables. Then see if you can find a
property remotely at that price where you live.

People need health care, they don't need most other business the same
way, So health care will track real inflation, not the bogus governemnt
numbers.

But there is the point, do you want corrupt corporates to rip you off?
Or corrupt big fat government to rip you off? You choose!

--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.