On 3/7/10 10:37 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:12 pm, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:

No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. Why? Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. They actually may be able to successfully file a slander suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.

Nope, you don't even get it. I (and my lawyer) have the posts that
Harry made stating that he know who I am, where I live, etc. That is
NOT anonymous. Stay tuned. You're not helping your asshole buddy Harry
one little bit.

Now, ask your asshole buddy this. If that blather above were true,
then how is he going to be able to tell the "authorities" that I
threatened him so when I show up at his house, he shoots me?


You've told us you're *not* Kevin Noble, **** for brains.




--
Which one is the girl?

http://tinyurl.com/ycpsnzz