jps wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:06:50 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...


Point is, Richard, that you paint yourself (and have many believers on
the right as a result of doing so) as a non-partisan but your stripes
shine through in the most obvious way.

Believe me when I say you have no idea what my "stripes" are.
You have a lot to say for someone who is so ignorant of facts.


I expect crickets or a punt, so don't feel the need to respond. You
won't disappoint me. Cuz, like you, I really don't give a **** what
you think.

Absolutely incorrect. I do care. I just don't respond well to narrow
minded, ill tempered and mean spirited people who have no tolerance for
points of view other than their own. You seem to have joined the "them
against
us" mindset, regardless of political persuasion.

Discussing issues with people like yourself (who would likely be
characterized as far more of an extremist than I) is pointless.

Hope your business is doing well.

Eisboch
I don't think you addressed this point...

If a "conservative" would make a comment about a Hispanic, it'd be
along the lines of "illegal, shiftless, lazy, freeloader, scab, etc."

And you count Plume's comment about the Hispanic population being
family-oriented and warm as being equivalently racist.

Is something about the second statement derogatory or do you find
warm, family-oriented people to be offensive?

--
Nom=de=Plume

GOOD GRIEF!

Eisboch

Also known as, I'm avoiding this 'cause I know I can't argue the
point.


Some of you folks argue just for the sake of arguing. Same old same
old, day after day after day. Old broken records sound better, and no
nasty language.