nom=de=plume wrote:
"anon-e-moose" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"CalifBill" wrote in message
...
"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:59:51 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

Well said. We have felt very little pain from this economy melt down.
Yes
the 10-20% unemployed, but most have unemploymnent insurance,
actually many don't. about 1M are set to lose it. and what about their
health insurance which they don't have?

The stimulus you love, will make sure all of them are employed. If they
have no assets, the taxpayers will pay their medical bills.
No one "loves" the stim, but it helped. Your claim is ridiculous on the
face of it. I guess you're unaware of how ERs work. They treat you with
or without insurance. If you don't have it, the taxpayer pays. That's the
most expensive way to treat people.

Stabilize and ship out. That's all a for profit hospital is required to
do.


And you think that's going to solve the healthcare problem... dumping people
on the street after they're "stable."

Didn't say they were put out on the street. Didn't say it was going to
solve the healthcare problem. Not for profits must accept them. It's the
law baby.
Sheesh, you have quite an imagination. I wonder if you are going a
little heavy on your meds?