BoatBanter.com - View Single Post - Austin plane crash: Full text of Joe Stack online suicide note

I am Tosk[_3_]

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:58:55 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:04:26 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:29:05 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
om...
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:06:58 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Feb 19, 12:19 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

news

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:12:45 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

I must admit, I agree with this guys letter. The appathetic sheep
in
US
and Canada should wake up and assert economic freedom to the
governments. Make the crooked *******s in our society pay with
their
lives.

Ah, Canadian al Qaeda. You're just as insane as we've come to
expect.

If it's Tim McVeigh or that assholes in Kansas who thinks he was
right
in killing the abortion doctor, it's just a crime.

If a brown person does it on behalf of Allah, they're a terrorist.

There's no difference between this asshole and bin Laden apart
from
the sizes of their organizations.

Good grief... Canuck thinks that a beef with the IRS means it's ok
to
kill
people. That's just sick.

--
Nom=de=Plume

He said this:

"I must admit, I agree with this guys letter. The apathetic sheep in
US and Canada should wake up and assert economic freedom to the
governments. Make the crooked *******s in our society pay with their
lives. "

Do you see ANYTHING there that promotes murder?

C'mon....

Tim, I don't think she's going to pass up any opportunity to throw the
gratuituous strawman into the fray. Without the informal fallacy,
most radicalized liberals would have to rely only on the patented
shout-down.

Screw you. You're a fraud intellectual. Canuck posted the entire rant,
then
Tim claimed there are pieces of it that are "reasonable." That's a
fraud.

Ma'am, I lay no claim to being an intellectual, legitimately or
otherwise. Tim did not claim in his original response to you that
"pieces of it are reasonable." He asked you if what he quoted was a
promotion of murder. The fraudulence lies in your diversion.

You're a liar.

Uh, nincdepoop, we can all read.

Perhaps you could be a tad more specific with your accusation. About what
did he
lie?
--
Annoy a Liberal...practice personal responsibility!

John H

Shocking! Someone isn't reading the posts to you? Wow...

He's lying about not claiming to be an intellectual. He's what's called a
pseudo-intellectual. Perfect example, watch Good Will Hunting. The guy in
the bar.

She's cloaked herself in the informal fallacy, and she's accusing me
of pseudo-intellectualism? She's had one too many beers with that
strawman.

Let's revisit the scene of her intellectual misdemeanor;

Nom=de=perpetrator: "Good grief... Canuck thinks that a beef with the
IRS means it's ok to kill people. That's just sick."
[...]
"Tim claimed there are pieces of it [Canuk's op-piece] that are
"reasonable." That's a fraud."

Victim of Intellectual Dishonesty: "Tim did not claim in his original
response to you that 'pieces of it are reasonable.' He asked you if
what he quoted was a promotion of murder. The fraudulence lies in
your diversion."

Harry de Plum doesn't really care much about facts...

Scotty

--
Can I haz Cheezeburger?