On Feb 5, 5:17*am, TopBassDog wrote:
On Feb 5, 1:14*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
news:d86dnZFcba45o_bWnZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@earthlink. com...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
news:OtSdnbWllLubkPbWnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d@earthlin k.com...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
news
qednS6bvJsC0vfWnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@earthl ink.com...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
news:767im5lscubm2bnpocjkqvnnbcg6ba9tno@4a x.com...
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 20:10:51 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:
I don't think that's happening in Afg. right now... at least not
from our
side. I could be wrong. In any case, you've identified the
problem that we
shouldn't be there for the long term certainly or in Iraq any
longer than
humanly possible. So, what's your solution? If we "just leave,"
a lot more
civilians would die, at least that's what all the generals are
saying.
So what? That will happen whenever we leave. We had the same
experience in Vietnam but a few years later everything worked
itself
out and now they are members of the global economy. Have you
looked at
the country of manufacture of wooden furniture lately?
According to who? The more stable we can make it, the fewer lives
will be
lost. So, your solution is.....
Get the hell out and let the big dog eat.
We are not in Iran and they look like they are going to throw out
the
mullahs all on their own (perhaps with a little covert help from
the
CIA)
Basically, you're saying that even though we broke it, we'll let a
massacre take place and that's ok. It isn't.
--
Nom=de=Plume
If we got out tomorrow, there will be civil war of 3-6 months.
Until they decide what they want as a country. *If we get out in 10
years, there will be civil war of 3-6 months. *Until they decide
what they want as a country.
According to Bill McKee, the expert in foreign relations.
Why don't you tell us about your many patents again.
--
Nom=de=Plume
You are the one who claims to be a patent attorney.
Feel free not to believe me.
I just loved your claim... you provide no name, no identifying
information beyond your fake name. The PTO database lists two (as I
recall) under that name, and you claim they're not yours. Basically,
you're a liar. You have no patents.
--
Nom=de=Plume
Real name, unlike Ndp.
In that case, you have no patents and you're a liar.
--
Nom=de=Plume
What is your license number? *No number, liar.
There's no chance I'm giving you or anyone here any way to find me. As I
said, you're the liar.
--
Nom=de=Plume
Does it comfort you *to know you can come into a news group and make
an idiot out of you self with secrecy, D'Plume?
Please allow me to correct my writing.
Does it comfort you to know you can come into a news group and make
an idiot out of "yew seff" with secrecy, D'Plume?