On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:37:54 -0500, Bruce wrote:

John H wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:59:22 -0500, wrote:


nom=de=plume wrote:

It means exactly that. $9500 vs. $80K? Is that a difficult comparison
for
you? Which would you pick?






As a percentage. It's relative. The two individuals in your scenario
don't have the option to "pick".




No... really? Yes, as a percentage...

If you could chose your situation was the question. duhhh...





That's a pointless question - duhhh.



For a VP of a Fortune 1000 company perhaps?




How is a career choice an option if the individual chooses to be lazy?


Do you think all people who aren't VPs of Fortune 1000 companies lazy?



More doubletalk. You are too obvious!

Holy ****. You jumped on me for my back and forths with Loogy. Have
you thought about the same thing with regard to you and d'Plum?

You and Loogy were "friends" at one point, right? Apples and oranges, John.

Oh. I sure hope you and d'plum never become friends!
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.