Don White wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
On 1/30/2010 5:35 PM, Don White wrote:
wrote in message
m...
On 1/30/10 1:59 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 30, 11:00 am, wrote:
H the K (I post with a Mac) wrote:





On 1/30/10 9:05 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
it.
I had thought my boat was in good condition except for needing
bottom
paint however, if you spend time aboard you find things......BAD
things. I thoroughly inspected the mast shroud connections to the
hull a couple years ago and thought they were solid. This morn when
I
woke up, looked up and saw an indentation in the wood around the
stainlesss plate attaching the main starboard shroud to the
bulkhead.
I pressed it. HOLY ****, ROT. Yikes. Gotta be fixed before any
significant sailing.
You should consider hanging up your shrouds before your family finds
it
necessary to put you in a shroud of a different kind. It seems like
just
about every time you go out in that boat, something significant fails
on
you. It seems more than an aging boat, too...it seems like a boat on
which maintenance is ignored until something significant happens or
is
discovered.
Were you not about to send your daughter and her boyfriend out to the
Bahamas in that boat? It would have been interesting for them if the
mast carrying full sails had collapsed and fallen into the water.
The messenger is an asshole but he does have a valid point.- Hide
quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -
It didn't fail you stupid ****. He hit something because the bridge
was inoperable.

Now *that* reads like a loogy post...even if it isn't.
~~ Snerk ~~........ yes, our boy Looney at his best.


Harry, it is so much fun to "snerk" with you, when are you coming back to
Halifax. You said next time I could pitch and you would catch.


Catch this...Floriduh Boy.


I have a reliable source that says you are barking up the wrong tree,
Rufus. WOOF!