On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:39:16 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:32:11 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


to real constitutional scholars.

the ruling was not correct. if it had been, it would have been 9-0.

it allows al qaida to buy air time to influence elections. but, then,
a conservativet, as lenin said, would sell someone the rope they'd use
to hang him



So any ruling not 9-0 is wrong? Seems if most of the SCOTUS rulings are
wrong according to you.

This talking point about AlQueda posting ads is hilarious. First off,
they wouldn't bother. But when his cousin, George Soros who also makes
millions on illegal drugs and such wants to give the Dems money, it's
ok. Either way, you are talking to WF3H, any ruling that is not endorsed
by Ginsberg is wrong in his opinion. The guy doesn't have the mental
capacity to go beyond that...

look for billboards telling us that saudi arabia is our friend and to
re elect the bushes because they're saudi arabia best paid politicians


Scotty