In article ,
says...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:32:11 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is
to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...-at-obama.html

--
Nom=de=Plume


Even more, Obama should resign for criticizing the SCOTUS during the State
of the Union Speech. Unprecedented! Trying to influence future rulings.
The ruling was correct, regarding the constitutionality of the law
according
to real constitutional scholars.

the ruling was not correct. if it had been, it would have been 9-0.

it allows al qaida to buy air time to influence elections. but, then,
a conservativet, as lenin said, would sell someone the rope they'd use
to hang him



So any ruling not 9-0 is wrong? Seems if most of the SCOTUS rulings are
wrong according to you.

This talking point about AlQueda posting ads is hilarious. First off,
they wouldn't bother. But when his cousin, George Soros who also makes
millions on illegal drugs and such wants to give the Dems money, it's
ok. Either way, you are talking to WF3H, any ruling that is not endorsed
by Ginsberg is wrong in his opinion. The guy doesn't have the mental
capacity to go beyond that...

Scotty