On 1/28/10 10:16 AM, Jack wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:44 am, wrote:
On Jan 27, 11:23 pm, wrote:





wrote in message

...
On Jan 27, 8:05 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Jan 27, 6:52 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...

Just finished reading this. It's worth consideration, I think.

Short summary can be viewed and read he

http://www.house.gov/ryan/press_rele...ses/RoadmapSum...

Detailed report with the numbers to back it up he

http://www.house.gov/budget_republic...dmap_detailed_...

Have fun,
Eisboch

Competely DOA as thunder said. Now is the time to spend money not
contract. If the private sector doesn't create jobs, the gov't must.
This
was learned the hard way by the Hoover administration.

Pssst... (looking around nervously) .... the "gov't" is broke.....

Eisboch

No it isn't. It's called deficit spending.

Broke implies insolvent or lacking in funds.
"Deficit spending is the amount by which a government, private
company, or individual's spending exceeds income"

Let's see... I spend more than I make, so I'm lacking in funds, so
therefore I'm "broke".
Why not just admit you're wrong.

OK plum, I'm wrong. I'm sure the US gov has plenty of money, and
they're just borrowing billions from China because it's fun. They
aren't lacking any funds at all.

Hey, I hear there's a show sale just down the street from you. Go buy
some.
Good ditz.

show, shoe. Jusr onw ket awat.


So, English is not your primary language...