On Jan 28, 7:31*am, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 17, 11:44*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Canuck57" wrote in message

...

On 17/01/2010 12:46 PM, bpuharic wrote:

To a liberal-democrat, they never take ownership of their problems.
Lib-dimwit Congress, not Bush controlled the budget. *Go figure,
congress liked all that waste of money they supported a GOP to get it.
LMAO.

a nice little fiction from the right wing

No fiction. *Conservative people tend to rely on themselves more. *Let
needy. *Conservatives are more likely to take ownership of the issues but
the liberals tend to ignore them easier.

the president also proposes a budget. *you're too stupid to know this

President can propose anything he wants. *But takes congress to approve
it. *How has that changed?

and right wingers ran the country for 6 of the last 8 years.

Congress has been democrat since at least 2004. *When do they get
ownership? *2104?

?? You're wrong, as usual.

http://uspolitics.about.com/od/usgov...ssional_calend...

so if obama, because he's president, is to blame for this year's
faults

Ditto Obama, he entered office with $10.5 trillion in debt and now at
$12.5 he has approved $2 trillion of debt-bailout-corruption spending..

Nope. You're wrong again.

who is to blame for the last 8?

As of inaguration, it was Obama's issue which he has done ZERO to abate
it. *Just made it worse actually.

So, no matter what Bush did, it's now all Obama's fault. Ok kook.

as i said...the right thinks obama's been pres for 8 years

So again, when is Obama responsible? *2108 or 2109?

But a year later, $2 trillion later, 20% rise in DC debt later,
Obama/Congress democritters have nothing to show for it but lost jobs,

?? hey genius

it took 10 years for us to get here. obama can't undo iin 1 year what
the right did to the country in 10

Didn't ask Obama to worry about Bush/Democrat congress $3 trillion over 8
years. *I want to know why Obama feels the need to debt spend at more than
quadrouple the rate!

Probably you don't know much of anything.

you guys...dumb as a bag of *hammers

Nope, just chose to see what you wish not to.

Strange lights in the sky?

lower wage jobs, threats of higher taxes and lots of rant about grabbing
health care moneys for government indisretions and corruption.

you guys have your socialism for the rich paid for by the middle class

Signed by a Democrat, LMAO. *Bush only gave GM enough to get to
Obama...which was peanuts. *So if Obama didn't agree and sponsor it, why
the hell didn't he force congress to make him do it? *Bush didn't, he
ceased being the president.

Force Congress?? At gun point?

Who knows, Obama could be called the founder of the new USSR. *United
States Socialist Republic. *Didn't work for the Russians, wonder why
lib-dimwits think it will work here? *Stupid?

we already have socialism

No arguement there. *Some amount is good such as K-12 and public roads.
Trouble is governmetns realy spend a lot less on common good than they
would have you believe.

Fortunately, you're not here, so you don't have to worry.

you just have to be rich to get it. it's called 'moralhazard'. look
it up.

So ismoralhazard the democrat justification for screwing up? *Or an
excuse?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Speaking of "moral hazard"

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/John_Edwa...s-made-sex...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, pity! Wll, at least he didn't plead guilty to toe tapping in an
air port bathroom.

*rolling eyes*