John H wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:07:31 -0500, Bruce wrote:

Loogypicker wrote:
Believe it or not, the pursuit of wealth is not the be all and end all
of life.

Then why do you tell lie after lie about what you own?

I don't have a $414 printer. Mine was $99 and faxes, scan, and copies!

I don't know how much my HP 895Cxi cost, but it's been a good printer.
I actually bought a Canon just for printing photographs. But, shortly
thereafter, I discovered how good a job Costco could do, for much less
than the cost of paper, let alone ink. Now the Canon barely gets used.
I keep waiting for the HP to bite the dust so I can get down to one
printer.


I've got a cherry HP fax machine I haven't used in years. Hardly anyone
faxes anymore. I have an eFax account that gets used maybe once every
quarter by me to send a fax. The few faxes I do get seem to come mostly
from overseas contributors to a newsletter I edit and publish.

I had a Canon i9900 (I think that's the model) photo printer, which I
had for four or five years or so. It started to malfunction, and the
estimate for shipping it to a qualified repair depot and back plus the
cost of repairs was more than the printer was worth. I did some research
and then found a really good price the Epson I bought, and it came with
a $50 rebate.

There's nothing wrong with using Costco for everyday prints, especially
4x6 prints.