View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Anony Mouse Anony Mouse is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 39
Default OT This is here, for the moment



"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:33:11 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 17/01/2010 12:46 PM, bpuharic wrote:

To a liberal-democrat, they never take ownership of their problems.
Lib-dimwit Congress, not Bush controlled the budget. Go figure,
congress liked all that waste of money they supported a GOP to get it.
LMAO.

a nice little fiction from the right wing


No fiction. Conservative people tend to rely on themselves more.


really? yes, i suppose all those conservative rich folks at goldman
sachs, etc. really relied on themselves when they started to tank,
didn't they. the rich would NEVER have thought of plundering the
middle class to pay for their $6000 umbrella stands.

more limbaugh kool aid.

Let
needy. Conservatives are more likely to take ownership of the issues
but the liberals tend to ignore them easier.


which is why, i suppose, conservative presidents have been the biggest
borrowers in US history


the president also proposes a budget. you're too stupid to know this


President can propose anything he wants. But takes congress to approve
it. How has that changed?


and who has to sign the budget?

oh, yes, the POTUS.


and right wingers ran the country for 6 of the last 8 years.


Congress has been democrat since at least 2004. When do they get
ownership? 2104?


when their policies have been implemented. so far the dems haven't
undone the damage the right has caused. the right preached free market
fundamentalism for 30 years. how long you think it's gonna take to
undo that damage? it's like trying to change the course of a
supertanker


so if obama, because he's president, is to blame for this year's
faults


Ditto Obama, he entered office with $10.5 trillion in debt and now at
$12.5 he has approved $2 trillion of debt-bailout-corruption spending.


to conservatives, the answer is to let unemployment go to 25%. now
that the rich are recovering, and the middle class has paid for it,
it's time to lay off the middle class.


But a year later, $2 trillion later, 20% rise in DC debt later,
Obama/Congress democritters have nothing to show for it but lost jobs,

?? hey genius

it took 10 years for us to get here. obama can't undo iin 1 year what
the right did to the country in 10


Didn't ask Obama to worry about Bush/Democrat congress $3 trillion over
8 years. I want to know why Obama feels the need to debt spend at more
than quadrouple the rate!


because if he DIDN"T we'd have 25% unemployment instead of 10%.
someone has to spend money. that's how this economy operates. if the
banks aren't lending and the consumer's not spending, who's left?

but you, of course, would just destroy the middle class now that we've
paid the bill for the rich



"Beam me back aboard Scotty; there's no sign of intelligent life here."