On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:45:44 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Jan 16, 2:13*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:08:05 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Jan 16, 2:00*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:31:39 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:57:45 -0500, John H wrote:

...to the USA, where he would have recieved all the rights and
privileges of citizenship including ACLU protection, the best of defense
attorneys, good food, air conditioning, and best of all, no questions.

http://tinyurl.com/y9tb78d

If only you knew what you were talking about. *One of the hijackers of
Flight 73, did make it to the USA. *He's serving a 160 year sentence at
ADX Florence.

You tell me which is the more efficient way of handling the problem.
--

John H

Trial by jury in the USA. There are a greater percentage of those
terrorist trials resulting in conviction than those in military court.

Who said anything about a military court? Hellfire's run about $70k
each.
--

John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

yep, typical conservative christian values. Just kill them all.

Whoa, nomdeplum found nothing wrong with attacking folks on the
ground. She seemed to think they were the enemy 'cause they were
running. No trial, no nothing, just running. Just like the guy in the
article. Alleged this, alleged that. What's the difference. If you
liberals were so interested in 'human' rights and the 'rule of law',
you'd be up in arms over Obama's treatment of folks just running on
the ground - alleged terrorists.
--

John H