On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:54:47 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:
On Jan 11, 4:53*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 2:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 2:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:
On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:
Looks like rec.boats is finished.
Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity
if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks
Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.
What post?
--
Nom=de=Plume
Maybe, the one you just answered to?
I was giving you sh*t. 
--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.
Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.
--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
That's jsut it. A lot of times you can;t tell who is "joking" and who
isn't. A lot of supposed jokes turn nasty and get serious, causing ill
feelings and resentments.
I think it's generally pretty obvious. In any case, I was replying to
Mike's
post (ummm... oh never mind).
--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you're posting to my
reply was a mistake, and that you told me that your reply to me was to
"give me sh*t" wasn't intended for me either.
No harm done.
Actually, it was my mistake to say I was giving you sh*t. I was giving Mike
sh*t. So, I apologize if I confused you.
--
Nom=de=Plume
Oh, I don't really think there is any confusion on my part
Please refer to post # 14
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...3d1?scoring=d&
If that doesn't solve any basis of confusion, and isn't satisfactory
to you , then please believe what you wish.
I'm done with the thread.
?;^ )
Apparently, she believes that an apology for your confusion is an
apology.
That's like saying I'm sorry she's so friggin' dense. I'd have to be
wrong, 'cause there's nothing dense about a vacuum.
--
America needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask.
John H