"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 2:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:

On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:

Looks like rec.boats is finished.

Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks

Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.

What post?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe, the one you just answered to?

I was giving you sh*t.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.

Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's jsut it. A lot of times you can;t tell who is "joking" and who
isn't. A lot of supposed jokes turn nasty and get serious, causing ill
feelings and resentments.


I think it's generally pretty obvious. In any case, I was replying to Mike's
post (ummm... oh never mind).

--
Nom=de=Plume