Do we need more of this?
In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says...
TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:08 am, Harry wrote:
TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 3, 1:59 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:07:49 -0800, jps wrote:
I think not.
Why do we let manufacturers flood the market with cheap weapons?
DECATUR, Ga. -- A 4-year-old boy who was struck by a stray bullet
while at church died Friday.
doesn't matter. the american people dont care how many kids get
killed. the NRA has the american people convinced that that only their
.25 automatics can stop an M1A2 abrams main battle tank if the govt
decides to take over.
I know you are talking foolishness, but still it would beat using
bricks like when the USSR invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968. After the
Czech's had been disarmed, that is all they had left.
Watching *you* face down a Sov T-55 main battle tank with your choice of
light arms would be a pay TV event I'd pay up to $2.00 American to
watch. Maybe your seeeeeeester could sue the tank, eh?
Armed American civilians on the far right might think they have what it
takes to be effective guerrilla fighters and take on temporarily a
modern, well-equipped army, but that's just a wet dream perpetrated by
watching Red Dawn too many times.
"Herr Krause. I can understand why you would make such an idiotic
comment for chances are, you probably never had any relatives held
behind the communist bloc. And no, Kerr Krause. There was no mention
of supposedly "small arms" facing off with a Soviet tank. Please re-
read.
He prefers Commie Krause to Herr Krause.
Quit calling me names, dumbfoch. I have guns.
|