wrote in message
...
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:46:56 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

So, what's your solution? We tried doing nothing during the early part
of
the Bush administration.

We invaded Afghanistan on October 7 2001, looking for Bin Laden and
according to your Sudan analysis we didn't even have a reason to look
until 9/11 of that year.


We invaded sort of (did you see the last 60 Minutes?), half-heartedly
looked
for him, and then Bush went after Saddam.

Not sure what you mean by my "Sudan analysis." I don't think I mentioned
Sudan.

You said that Clinton had no reason to take OBL in Sudan. Bush had a
similar problem prior to 9-11 if he wanted to use the same probable
cause logic. After 9-11 it was simply "kill the *******", as it should
have been after the 1993 WTC bombing.

The football game screwed up my recording of 60 minutes


I didn't say that. I said that he had no legal authority to do so. Bush's
problem was that he didn't follow through on what he should have, and went
cowboy on Iraq, which was totally unjustified.

I'm sure you can find it on cbs.com. I believe it's the first segment.

--
Nom=de=Plume