Harry wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:59:03 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Dec 28, 3:22 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:19:46 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Dec 28, 1:09 pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article a8e218c8-4ede-497f-937c-a4e158ccb983
@e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...
On Dec 27, 11:52 am, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:48:18 -0500, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 06:49:48 -0500, Harry

wrote:
Jon Stewart pointed out that these climate savers managed
to lease
every limo in western europe, some couriered in from as far
away as
Germany so nobody had to share a ride.
Well, you can't have people who are interested in saving the
planet have to
ride two to a limo or two to a jet, now can you. It's just
not done.
I wonder how many heating oil tanks could have been filled
for what was
spent on that extravaganza.
BTW, what's a caviar wedge? I understand they ate a lot of
caviar. That
would have bought a lot of turkeys at the shelters.
I bet they had expensive cognac and real Cuban cigars, too.
Nothing too good for our tax dollars.
Steve
Does anyone recall "stevie" objecting when bush was spending
like a
drunken sailor, and cutting taxes for the wealthy at the same
time?
Hypocrisy, thy real name is republican/conservative. Nothing
is piled
higher than republican/conservative b.s.
I was complaining about the Bush/Clinton/Bush war long before it
became Obama's war. Is that the spending you are talking about?
Just because it was bad then doesn't mean it's bad now. Obama
is doing
it now, therefore it's a good thing. He's just emulating a bad
precedent, but since it *is* a precedent, it's a good thing to
emulate.
I think this is the correct loogic.
"Loogic", I like it...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Try this. Ask the liar where I EVER said such. I know he won't
apologize for his out and out lie, Harry doesn't either.
Yeah, but Loogic works, it's a new word. It is when someone uses the
idea of proving a negative as proof soemthing exists in the first
place.
It's like asking "did you beat your wife last night", or asking Harry
about his Lobsta' boat as a method of debate...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Show me ONE PLACE where I've asked someone to prove a negative. If you
are talking about when Bill stated that something was NOT the cause of
global warming and I asked him to prove that, that's not a negative.
Bill stated that as FACT. And John DID lie about me.
So show me the quoted lie. Otherwise STFU.
--

John H

Here you go, are you going to apologize now? I'm guessing not, Harry
on the unhinged left side doesn't either. Notice, "according to
Loogy"? Where did I state that?

"Hey, they set a precedent. There's good ones and bad ones. According
to Loogy, they should all be emulated just 'cause they're precedents."

I said this:

"Just because it was bad then doesn't mean it's bad now. Obama is
doing it now, therefore it's a good thing. He's just emulating a bad
precedent, but since it *is* a precedent, it's a good thing to
emulate."

Your name isn't mentioned. You're making up ****, just like Harry.


Give it up, ****-for-brains. You make up more political crap than almost
any poster here.


Whomever this spoofer is, he is loosing it. He has gone over the edge.