On Dec 23, 1:45*pm, Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 23, 1:16*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message
....
On Dec 23, 9:43 am, John H wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8
I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting
such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as
racist as I am.
Oh well.
--
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
John H
Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****?
Sure he does...
http://www.therightperspective.org/2...ally-on-the-ob...
--
Nom=de=Plume
I wanted to see how long I could string Jack and John on about
this......
They really, really wanted to believe it was true.
That site seems bogus. If you look at:
http://timpanogos.wordpress.com/2009...ia-no-kidding/
You'll see that the tree is in fact a Douglas fir, not a Fraser as
that site indicates. Another link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Christmas_tree
Notice that this also indicates the 2009 Obama tree is a Douglas. So,
that website that indicates the decorations are fake is in itself a
fake, as it's sole point is that they say the tree is a Fraser, and it
is not.
Nice try, but it still appears your boy has Mao and Hedda on the WH
tree. Classy.
And you guys will beleive anything, huh? ~snerk~