Harry wrote:
On 12/21/09 7:03 PM, Don White wrote:
"Don wrote in message
...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 21, 2:51 pm, Don wrote:
Harry wrote:
In articlebf6dndBAvrikI7LWnZ2dnUVZ_sZi4...@giganews. com,
says...
Don White wrote:
"Don wrote in message
...
Harry wrote:
On 12/20/09 9:08 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Harry wrote:
On 12/20/09 2:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:49 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Often I'm accused of "avoiding" truth when it comes to AGW.
I'm the
"creationist" in a sense that I don't understand the highly
complex
nature of climate anatomy. I'm picking on "details". I'm a
corporate
schill. I don't understand "peer review" (even though I
have
"peer
reviewed" over 600 math texts, dissertations and master's
thesis
in my
life). Yada, yada, yada.
Ok - without getting into the politics, I want Loogy and
the
other
AGW
types to defend this.
http://www.financialpost.com/opinion...tml?id=62e1c98...

Remember - this is your side - this is how you are
presenting
your
information. This describes what happens when one of the
most
widely
used sources of information is controlled and massaged and
only one
side of the "science" is presented.
Go ahead - defend this.
I'll wait.
Okay. Just because SOME (a very small percentage) tried to
cook some
books does in no way shape nor form prove whether or not
global
warming is or isn't occuring.
It's not whether it's occurring or not, it's whether it will
reach
some troublesome level.
And it might even be a blessing in disguise!
What?
How so?
Lets say the world on average goes up 6C. Real big amount, even
more
than the zealots say is worst case. Lets theorize what happens.
Some of
this is based on fact as it has occured before in recent and
ancient
history.
http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7x.html
Ok, the polar regions melt, 2/3rds of the ice is less than
10,000
years
old anyway. Polar regions will see most of the warming as
evaporation
and ocean currents will regulate it. Contrary to the ocean is
rising, it
may actually receed. Warmer polar air will carry much more vapor
and
rainfall. And as ice melts it shrinks in volume with the release
of
trapped gases and molecular contraction. Basic high school
stuff,
try
it, freeze water in a thin glass container and watch it crack
when
the
water hits -5C and expands.
Without the cold on the polar regions average humidity will
increase.
Rain forests maybe even in Alaska. Vegitation in the north and
southern
hemispheres grow more quickly retaining water on land, taller
and
more
prolific. A byproduct of this is more farm land, especially in
Russia
and in Canada. Maybe even grow oranges in Wisonsin some day.
Fish
population in northern lakes will grow quicky, making commercial
harvesting in Hudsons Bay and other large areas economical for
food
harvesting due to fast growing fish stocks in warmer waters.
Something
is going to have to give with Africa's population growth as food
is
going to be soon short if they continue.
Who knows, golfing might not be so bad in January twilight in
Fairbanks
Alaska or the Yukon. Certainly the fishing will be much better.
As new air currents form, less dry air, world percipitation is
bound to
go up in most areas. Given fresh water is a problem for most
countries
in the world, this is very good. Not much lives without water.
Many
deserts will return to lush vegitation as was seen in other eras
such as
the Jurasic. In fact, the Jurasic had 6 time todays carbon
levels
and so
much vegitation heards of dionosaurs did quite well. Reptiles
enjoyed
the constant warm climate. Especally in the Jurasic Terrestrial
period
where huge herds of herbivorous dinosaurs like the Brachiosaurus
would
eat 400 pounds of food per day! That is a lot of carbon just in
breathing and craping, forge tthe methane. That is a lot of
green
salad
to feed herds of these.
The plants grew fast with lots of carbon, essential for most
plant
life
after all in this period and periods before it that is where the
coal,
natural gas and oil really came from in the first place. Just
dead
mater
cooked for eons...carbon trapped and not released, it isn't even
man
made. But the addtitional carbon allows for more vegitation
which
we as
humans need for one reason or another. Eat you peas, a main
ingredient
is carbon as is the roast beef.
But something good can't be used by government and fraudsters to
suck
money out of your pocket. The earth has checks an balances we
don't
fully understand, but can see in the billions of years of fossil
records
they exist. Even when a huge extinction even occurs, the earth
gets
around to compensating for it. And causes are often
intersellar, a
metor
here and there. In fact the most prolific life diversity periods
atomospheric carbon was very high.
My suggestion is for mankind to forget CO2 issues, end silly
wars,
even
if you have to low yeild nuke'em. Nuking them burns less carbon,
imagine
the pile of CO2 and plastics spent on middle east wars! We waste
far too
much time on power, greed, herd insanity and feeding politicial
and
social egos. Want to insure mankinds survival, go to the
stars and
populate elsewhere and work on social evolution to match
technology. As
one of these next items can end it all in short order, just like
many of
the the mass extinction events in the past.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:%2...9_mathilde.jpg
Now that could be a problem worth the hype as there will be no
boating
with beer for many, many years.... CO2 is designed to keep our
minds off
of strife, off of our governments screw ups of economics, off
the
flaws
of modern society. Feeds the idle minds fear and off of the real
issues.
Sort of like teach them to hate somethign else like CO2, and
they
will
hate you less. It is herd management for tax slavery.
We as a species think too shallow to last on more than shier
luck.
Andromeda Strain, The Omega Man all possibilities as out of
control
herds of humans can develop something it now. But we don't have
the
social controls in place to prevent it. Who knows, many H1N1 or
AIDS
mutates...history is full of plagues. But as H1N1 is turning
out,
just
FUD that sells lots of mercury vapor (polutant) laced drugs for
profit.
But at least it might be warmer in the mean time. Can't say skin
holds
up well in sub-zero temperatures now or 10,000 years from now.
Lets hope
the crazies are right and it is actually warming. Remember, it
wasn't
that long ago the junk scientists said it was cooling. 10
years is
squat
in earths history and for that much to change smells of knee
jerk
junk
science.
So please go to bed with greenie FUD induced fear. Me, I will go
to bed
knowing the sun will rise and the world will be here. Even if it
isn't,
I would rather enjoy my much too short of a life than pander to
bull****
fraudsters.
Thankfully, you are in charge of nothing and no one rational will
consider your opinions. You're left with the ditzy former
governor
of
Alaska and the even nuttier U.S. Senator from Oklahoma.
I sure am glad that you and I are smart enough that they always
consider
our opinion. It would suck if we were like the Ditzy Army where
they
just posted in rec.boats thinking they would make a difference.
** Warning... Warning**
The jackasses are now spoofing me. If the post you read seems
stupid,
assume it's FlatulentJim or one of the other Dopey Army rejects
posting
under my name.
Damn, now the stupid spoofer is trying to sound like the robot in
"Lost
in Space", what a dope.
This guy posing as me is stupid as dirt.
I got your back, little buddy. Remember, I have guns.
Yah, you and Dick Chaney.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Who in hell is Dick Chaney, dummy?

Dick this, Chaney boy.

If you are going to highlight every misspelled word or sytex error I
make,
you won't have time to cause your normal trouble.

My son and i donnut believe in education, it is a waste of time, and
real
men don't spend time in school.

Oh my... looks like LooneyTunes is as dumb as The Freak.
Falling for the spoofers.. ~~ snerk ~~



I've often wondered which of those two would capture the prize for
dumbest poster in the newsgroup. It's not an easy decision.

I have offton wondered why you spend so much time talking about them?
is it becuase you emphesize with them?