View Single Post
  #102   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
nom=de=plume nom=de=plume is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"Geoduck" wrote in message
m...
On 12/20/09 4:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:49 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Often I'm accused of "avoiding" truth when it comes to AGW.
I'm the
"creationist" in a sense that I don't understand the highly
complex
nature of climate anatomy. I'm picking on "details". I'm a
corporate
schill. I don't understand "peer review" (even though I have
"peer
reviewed" over 600 math texts, dissertations and master's
thesis in my
life). Yada, yada, yada.

Ok - without getting into the politics, I want Loogy and the
other AGW
types to defend this.

http://www.financialpost.com/opinion...tml?id=62e1c98...

Remember - this is your side - this is how you are presenting
your
information. This describes what happens when one of the most
widely
used sources of information is controlled and massaged and only
one
side of the "science" is presented.

Go ahead - defend this.

I'll wait.

Okay. Just because SOME (a very small percentage) tried to cook
some
books does in no way shape nor form prove whether or not global
warming is or isn't occuring.

And why we need 100% rational hard real scientists to look at the
issue
without the policitical money grabing schemes. Currently it is
about
money, money greed. Carbon tax, carbon credits and extortion.
That
isn't science, that is political greed and nanny state BS.

Even if it is warming, is that so bad? Equatorial zones have
evaporation to keep temperatures moderate, but the polar areas
would get
most of the warming. Is that so bad you can golf or go boating
in
norther US or Canada in January?

Hell, that is green, as more green further north would not hurt
mankind.
Be it golf green or green in your pocket. My utility bill would
even
become more moderate and less carbon to heat my home at -35C.

Eco nuts are "sky is falling" nut balls following the government
love in
for excuses for more taxes. Someone wise once said to me, always
follow
the money for your answers. Well the green thing is fostered by
government greed for taxation, be it carbon taxes or carbon
credits it
is about taking our money for them to waste on GM/Bank/Government
like
ponzi schemes. In the mean time, more green lawns and forrests
will
absorb more carbon. Nature has a unique way of balancing the
Earth and
eco freeks just don't want to admit that hard fact of reality.


Good grief... well, you've pretty much summed up the loonieness of
the
deniers. Good for you!


--
Nom=de=Plume


You just accentuated the loonieness of the gullible.



Yeah, I guess when someone talks science, it seems like magic to
you...



It's sorta interesting that we have several right-wingers in here who
*claim* to be scientists, but apparently have no ability to apply the
thought processes they learned in other fields to the ones usually
discussed here. I wouldn't call McKee a scientist of any sort,
though...his last work experience was rounding up illegals at
shape-ups to work on home improvement projects.

Actually the only times I have rounded up day laborers at the
gathering spots, was because the request for workers to the EDD never
supplied workers. And as a degreed engineer with patent and designing
high tech and biomed stuff, I would qualify as a scientist a hell of a
lot more than a person who sells used clothes and or is a clam.


Whooo... try again to put me down if it makes you feel better. Why
don't you tell us about your "patent" that's either pending or
completed.

--
Nom=de=Plume


You are a claimed Patent attorney. Do a search.


Ok... look, just to be clear, I don't know if your real name is William
McKee. And, the fact that I did a search and found two patents under that
name in NO WAY could possibly confirm that I am or am not a patent
attorney. Anyone, perhaps even you, can do the search, which is what I
said previously.

Here you go...

http://tinyurl.com/yzwldr2

I'm going to sleep...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Try again. Wrong patents.



Well, since you won't give me your real name, then I give up. You win. Happy
now?


--
Nom=de=Plume