This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Dec 21, 1:13*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Steve B" wrote in message
...
"Don White" wrote in message
.. .
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Steve B" wrote in message
...
Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the
environment
isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act.
--
Nom=de=Plume
Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the
situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve
hardware and technology. *It does not mean issuing what is
essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. *Carbon credits?
Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name.
All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that
money come from? And who gets a cut? *ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton.
Rothschilds. *It goes on from there. *It's hypocritical to be talking
about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and
having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard.
Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and
need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and
use less fuel in transportation. *But that's only for the little
people. *The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you
educated into it?
Steve
Technology is part of the answer, obviously.
Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying
3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to
deal with it. Yes, that seems fair.
Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?
--
Nom=de=Plume
The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. *I think that all
children should learn two things by age five. *One, life is not fair.
|