On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:16:55 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Dec 19, 6:56*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Gene" wrote in message

...



On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:27:26 -0800, jps wrote:

Using your logic, we should sit on our hands until its positively
proven we have some net effect on the atmosphere.

Talking points again? Using my logic, we need to know WHAT to do,
unless just *anything* would make you feel better.....

In that case, why the hell should we cut emissions? *I think we should
bring back all the flourocarbons. *I miss 'em.

Thanks for making my point.....
--
It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are
enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.
-Thomas Sowell

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Forté Agent 6.00 Build 1186

Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment
isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Amazingly stupid response from you."

Another 'ah-ha' light comes on!

Soon there'll be enough for our own rec.boats Christmas tree.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H