|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,921
|
|
They just don't get it...
In article 3d7c8dbb-f6d2-400e-a303-
, says...
On Dec 19, 12:32*pm, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article cb366de3-10b3-498f-abcf-c0b88715c8b4
@h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says...
On Dec 18, 8:44*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f-
,
says...
On Dec 18, 12:50*pm, thunder wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote:
From the second article:
"...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer
of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense
offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth.
There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest
transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. *Or, did you think
Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country?
But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our
need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing.
What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or
couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do...
Yeah, I know. Raping the landscape for oil shale, more refineries,
more coal, same old same old.
Again, you generalize and cherry pick what you would want to be our
point of view, and dismiss it at the same time... Same old, same old..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Really, how many examples of the above do you need?
Well, show me where I said it...
|