posted to rec.boats
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,921
|
|
Approval ratings not the best...
In article 1136ce5d-9ae4-46d0-a90f-ab3f55cc54f4
@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...
On Dec 18, 8:36*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 15924f43-92b2-4d45-941c-2e6538b91760
@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...
On Dec 18, 1:23*pm, Jim wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:06:03 -0600, thunder
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:32:00 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
I am sorry but it bugs me big time that no democrats are concerned about
the secret meetings and the lack of any time to review the biggest bill
in history. That has got to set off bells with even the lowest level
thinkers...
Is this the first time you have paid attention to the legislative
process? *Frankly, this is how it's done. *It's ugly, untidy, but there's
nothing new here. *
Bull****. But if you have to defend them, it's as good a bull**** as
anyone puts out.
Blindly following, indeed!
I was HOPEing for Some CHANGE up there but it seems like it's business
as usual. Oh Well.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yep, the right will do anything at any cost to derail anything the
left does, not matter how good it is, how many people will benefit, or
what it will do.
It seems arrogant of you to assume that nobody can have a truly opposing
point of view. And when one is as one sided as "some here", everybody
will seem to be on the "other side"....- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
When did I say that someone can't have an opposing point of view?
You have stated several times that folks who have opposing points of
view must either be "lying or uninformed", never admitting that there
could be a legitimate "opposing point of view"...
|