"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 11:11 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 18, 12:37 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Dec 17, 12:45 pm, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message
m...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M

Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy.

This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of
substance.

Isn't that the definition of a politician?
I think he's got jsut a good of a chance as anyone else.

but he doesn't lie enough, probably.

The better the liar, the better the politician.

Why don't you think he doesn't lie enough?

Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it
doesn't
cut it now.

--
Nom=de=Plume
You are correct. D'Plume. The executive branch of your government is
overflowing with honesty, integrity, and ethical virtue with no regard
to Kantian duty.

Never said that. Perhaps you need to get a reading lesson from someone.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Then, why didn't you say so?


Say what? I said, "Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the
past, but it doesn't cut it now."

You then said, "The executive branch...."

Would like to clarify what exactly you're trying to say? Perhaps start with
something that's not quite so lame.

--
Nom=de=Plume