"mmc" wrote in message
g.com...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"mmc" wrote in message
g.com...

"Steve B" wrote in message
...

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 10:09 am, "mmc" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...



And to think many on the right believe every word he utters....

Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a
statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the
climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that
global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed
to
be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of
AccuWeather
on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a
manner
that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked
by
Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record
cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather
guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything
like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that
global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man
has
NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting
that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming.
We
just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that
was
from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject
of
course.

One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to
stick
together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line.

Copenhagen, not Geneva.

reply:

Typical lib not to even know the major details of the conversation.

Geneva. That's rich.

Steve

Details and facts don't matter to those on either far end of the
political stick.
Ron Paul 2012.



Ron Paul is absolutely at the far end of the political stick. He's an
ultra-libertarian, and he's irrational about what is right or even
possible politically. He's a joke.


--
Nom=de=Plume

The joke part is that he dosen't stand a chance as long as there are
bought and paid for Republicans AND Democrats driving this screwed up
train. Paul is far less a joke than many of the elected celebrities from
the big 2.
Why are both sides so afraid of a third party? The closest we're allowed
to have is Ralph Nader, who corporate America buries by pumping huge $$$
into the Rep/Dem beauty contests.
I guess it's better sharing almost every elected office in this country
with one other group instead of two.
Neither you nor the Reps want to see mainstream America calm and working
together. Like the cable news programs upon which you suckle, MSNBC and
FOX, you'd rather see people divided than a strong group in the middle -
otherwise your collective BS would dry up and blow away.
Politics in this country has become a battleground where mud slinging,
lies about the opposition and fake campaign promises are the weapons. It's
disgusting.

We need to be strong but empathetic; we need corporate America but it
cannot be allowed to run the country; we need to take care of our old and
poor that cannot help themselves, anyone young enough and able should work
if they want to eat; the "Octo-mom" does NOT have the right to tax money
to use her vagina as a clown car.
These are things I believe.



He doesn't stand a chance because rational people know that what he's been
promoting is just plain dumb, won't work, and is ridicules on the face of
it.

I'd be happy to see a viable 3rd party.

--
Nom=de=Plume