On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:42:20 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 17, 2:30*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:31:07 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Dec 17, 9:21*am, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:10:05 -0500, John H
wrote:

...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.

Travesty. *Clearly, Lance Armstrong is the athelete of the century
because he's actually an athelete.

Golfers aren't atheletes.

It might be too early to say definitively, but there seems to be a trend
* emerging. First Obama Then Woods. Who will get the next prize.

Are you suggesting this because they are both black? Seems to be the
only common thread of the two.

Er...actually, Mr. Woods isn't "black" or an African American. He
considers himself an American. I think he describes himself as
Cablinasian which, last time I knew, wasn't "black".

Woods is 1/4 African American, 1/4 Thai, 1/4 Chinese, 1/8 Native
American and 1/8 Dutch.

YMMV of course.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We exception of the african an asianatic influences, I'd say he's
about as mixed as I am.

English/Scottish, German, French, American Indian.... and whatever
else stuffed in there.

You forot lemur, rhesus monkey and bearded collie. :)