On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:26:38 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Rob" wrote in message
news:Xf2dnf3jiL9U4rTWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@giganews. com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M

Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy.




This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance.

He explicated his idealogy, and he did so very well. Distinctly
expressing an idealogy is necessary to help an electorate determine a
whether a candidate is one worth voting for.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access


"His idealogy" No substance, as I said. Do or do not words "count"?

You're playing a game with semantics. An idealogy is an idealogy
simply because it is substantive. Otherwise everything you or anyone
else in this forum spews out is nothing more than a Lewis Carroll
musing. For your own sake, you need to learn to be 'wrong' on
occassion.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access