On Dec 17, 5:59*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:00:42 -0800, "mgg" wrote:

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
messagenews:77aji51ahe8v17fhl93l5mnm3l7ja2tj3h@4a x.com...
Whoopsie....

"It's true, and it's huge. Today another example of CRU having their
foot on the scale, Russian papers are reporting that the Russian
surface station data was sorted by CRU to use the highest warming
stations only."

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/1...s-cru-tampered....

That ain't nuttin' compared to what NASA, NOAA and DOE are going to be
forced to release.

Science fraud at it's best.

Gawd, we can only hope. Tell all the plants I lost last week due to an
unusual freeze about global warming. ;-) Most were annuals that you guys
lose in September, but mine usually last thru the New Year, or longer.

I don't know, but rumor has it that the US data base is worse than the
CRU data base because - and this is really rich - the CRU data base
was massaged even further and US stations were massaged in the same
way as the Russian data.

Or so I've heard. We'll see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Watch out, black helicopters....duck....