Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 17, 9:21 am, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:10:05 -0500, John H
wrote:
...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.
Travesty. Clearly, Lance Armstrong is the athelete of the century
because he's actually an athelete.
Golfers aren't atheletes.
It might be too early to say definitively, but there seems to be a trend
emerging. First Obama Then Woods. Who will get the next prize.

Are you suggesting this because they are both black? Seems to be the
only common thread of the two.

Heavens no, Loogie. That would be racist. Surely you can think of a non
race related similarity to the awards.