For the children's sake...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:27:42 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:27:21 -0600, Richard Casady
wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:58:43 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:
Why do you s'pose they didn't just make it a felony to drive with any
passenger in the car?
Many bad ideas are sold as ' for the children '
Casady
I agree with Tim. The children not in the car deserve protection also.
--
John H
Guy blows 0.08 and a kid in the car. He goes to jail for more than a year,
felony, and the kid ends up in foster care, or the mom and kid end up
sleeping in a shelter. Just like a lot of other mandatory sentencing laws.
unintended consequenses rule.
Black woman, drives a Cadillac, lives on welfare and pops kids out
every year so she can increase her welfare payments.
Gee, I never would have thought of that as a comeback. I'm sure Miss La
Plume will high five you again.
--
Imagine being such a worthless p.o.s. that you post on usenet using
someone else's ID
|