View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Bill McKee Bill McKee is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,197
Default Asswipe Loogys Smart Question Of The Week


"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:27:05 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:

Casinos use facial recognition software to photograph
people coming in the door and compare them to a database of cheats
and
counters.

To a casino a "cheat" is someone who manages to leave with more money
than they came in with.

The governments foster this belief because they lose tax revenue when
you leave with more than you came in with.


Yet you have to turn inside out to deduct losses. We had an old guy who
came into the Hilton when they started the $100 slot machines. $300 a
pull
if you played all three lines. He lost big time, yet along the way, he'd
win $10k here and $50k there, every time having to fill out an IRS form
for
winnings over $1,000. Ended up, he lost all his money, and had a hefty
IRS
bill, and could not deduct the losings. He was about 80, and his
attitude
was, "What they gonna do, throw me in jail for the rest of my life?"
Papers
got ahold of it, and it died a quiet death shortly after that. He
probably
did, too.


Reminds me of the "day traders" of about 10 years or so ago. Big article
printed in the local paper in early April of 2000. There was a guy whose
brokerage account had about $10,000 in it yet he owed the IRS about
$250,000 in taxes from the profits that he made in 1999 on his day
trading. He would make a huge profit on one trade and then lose it all
on the next trade. But, the government didn't care. Profit is profit and
you could only claim $30,000 in losses at that time.




The limit on losses is long term losses. I remember the case of the casino
slot machine winner and the IRS problems.