wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:48:28 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:43:31 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)"
wrote:

The bush admin deliberately let bin laden get away:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uk_IL...layer_embedded


snerk
I think Bin Laden is really pretty insignificant in the grand scheme
of things but if we didn't have him around we would invent another
bogie man to give us an excuse to look.
I always believed we did kill OBL in Tora Bora and we just let the
legend live on unchallenged for that reason.


We're going to smoke him out... perhaps he meant via wacky tobacci...


The Afghanis always made the best hash



Do you think bin Laden is insignificant compared to, say, finding
weapons of mass destruction, or having the iraqis pay for our
involvement in their country, or in stabilizing iraq, afghanistan, or
the palestinian territory, or lebanon, all of which were colossal lies
and foreign policy blunders of the previous mis-administration.

:)



--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.