On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:51:30 -0600, Jerry Zinn
wrote:

It doesn't. In fact it is quite a bit more restrictive than our
current "socialized" medical system of employer subsidized insurance
and hospitals that charge us enough to pay for the uninsured.

It's time to stop watching FOX and try to understand what a real
healthcare system is. You do realize we are 37th in the world in
providing healthcare. Or is that to difficult for you to accept as
with the earlier post you prefer to remain ignorant and hatefull.

For a particular value of "providing healthcare". One very big
criterion in that particular measurement is cost. It costs a lot of
money to have so many Cat-scan machines all over the country, for
instance. Lowering our score because we spend so much money on them
is of questionable value.

BTW, I don't watch FOX, and I want universal health care done right -
not the one that the medical industry is paying Congress for. I
suppose it is better than the status quo though.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison