nom=de=plume wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
TopBassDog wrote:
On Nov 29, 8:54 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Nov 29, 5:01 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:54:08 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:
What Washington state needs in much stiffer gun laws, to ensure
these
murderous criminials will not be able to repeat this crime again.
When guns are outlawed, only outlaws have guns.
That's a canard. When guns are regulated, fewer outlaws have guns.
--
Nom=de=Plume
W-O-O-O-O-SH!
Sound of your brain getting flushed?

--
Nom=de=Plume
No , that is the sound of the least amount of intelligence flying
right over your head. And not that far above either.
Do we really know how many outlaws have guns? I guess that if only one
outlaw turned in his gun after guns are regulated, the plum's statement
would be true. Such brilliance from our skinny little waif in the forest.
You mean the fat, nail chewing slob in Maryland...


I think he was talking about me, not you.


English is not The Tosk's primary language.


--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.