In article ,
says...

TopBassDog wrote:
On Nov 29, 8:54 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Nov 29, 5:01 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:54:08 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:
What Washington state needs in much stiffer gun laws, to ensure these
murderous criminials will not be able to repeat this crime again.
When guns are outlawed, only outlaws have guns.
That's a canard. When guns are regulated, fewer outlaws have guns.
--
Nom=de=Plume
W-O-O-O-O-SH!
Sound of your brain getting flushed?

--
Nom=de=Plume

No , that is the sound of the least amount of intelligence flying
right over your head. And not that far above either.

Do we really know how many outlaws have guns? I guess that if only one
outlaw turned in his gun after guns are regulated, the plum's statement
would be true. Such brilliance from our skinny little waif in the forest.

You mean the fat, nail chewing slob in Maryland...