nom=de=plume wrote:

Like I said, maybe. Clearly, the property wasn't abandoned, since someone
was there at the end of John's story.

Of course, without the complete facts, it's hard to know what would happen.

We were all waiting for this enlightenment.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats,
because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch
dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident
on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day.