On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:57 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/24/09 4:23 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...


You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't.

He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax.

JPS: Did that *list* find its way to you?

Just looked. Thanks. Responded.