In article 52b43b8f-49d5-4898-ab91-baef3bfce870
@e7g2000vbi.googlegroups.com, says...

On Nov 23, 3:28*pm, John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:32:06 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports





wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:18:24 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:49:45 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H
wrote:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode

And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent
and supress free and open scientific discovery.

Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann.

This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else
in modern history.

He should be put in jail to rot forever.

Yup, he and his 'hockey stick' are right in the middle of it.

Another f*ing joke!

You want to see how it all unfolded?

John Hindraker has done yeoman work on the email files.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive.../11/024995.php

I can say this - Steve McIntyre feels completely vindicated and while
he's too nice a guy and much to humble to toot his own horn, there's a
smile on his face today.

Real science might actually win the day.

That was a great article. The part about the tree rings was
fascinating. My brother, the atheist liberal, is a 'tree scientist'
recently retired from Weyerhauser. He, of course, is a firm believer
that man has caused every bit of global warming.

We aren't talking now, or I'd get his reaction to the blog. Actually,
he'd just be ****ed and shoot the messenger.
--

John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, those scientists, what in hell do they know? It's not like they
know as much about science as conservative politicians, Rush and
Hannity et al.

Well, the scientists who found the problems with the research know that
they have been threatened with violence. How come you only acknowledge
the scientists who agree with you, since there are so many who don't?
Listen, when is enough of the "science" being fudged going to convince
you that there is something wrong there?