BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

nom=de=plume

"Candy Man" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Candy Man" wrote in message
...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:38:04 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
om...
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:37:06 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:k21fg5tc1hq4i1n6ovdhuvlnbaft2vf7dn@4ax .com...
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:38:31 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:nkqdg5t8v49g1t8tm7oci5mq8qonqo12gb@4 ax.com...
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:08:02 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:e3pdg5h3e1h6e0tob9quq9k0v6d5ckktag @4ax.com...
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:31:32 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/20/09 1:19 PM, wrote:

So, I take it that you decline to submit evidential material
to
confirm his role as a community organizer?

Jesus can be whatever you want..., just as "the bible" can
prove or
disprove any belief you have.

As an example, to me, if he existed at all, Jesus was a pretty
cool
dude
with some socially acceptable ideas about his fellow man who
spent
his
life preaching his vision of Judaism to Jews in the general
area in
which he supposedly lived, and who had no idea or desire to
convert
Jews
or pagans to a new religion. As with every other religion,
Christianity
is a creation of man.

If Jesus was a pretty cool dude, then he's so simply because
you've
created Him that way in your own mind?

Can't speak for Harry, but He was a "cool dude" because of his
message
of
peace, acceptance, and healing.

His message like this?

NAS Mark 9:19 And He *answered them and *said, "O unbelieving
generation, how long shall I be with you? How long shall I put up
with
you? Bring him to Me!"

As I said... out of context. You're starting to sound silly. If you
don't
like Jesus' message, why not just say so.

You don't seem to know what His message is. And I'm certain that
you
are unable to articulate what the context of Mark 9:19 is.

I'm sure you're able to tell us. In any case, this has nothing to do
with
the vitriol from the right. Or, maybe it does.

Hopefully you're not ready to venture into the ignoble domain of the
circumstantial ad hominem. Few go there and return to the land of
reason.

Not sure what you're talking about. It's a fact that what I said was
accurate about the right. Don't you remember Rudy's little convention
speech.

Circumstantial ad hominem?

As if he hasn't provided enough direct proof of his fundy idiocy?

I know, we can figure it out by having a bible quoting contest!

ROFL! What contest, dude? You haven't quoted or cited anything!
you've tied yourself into knots trying to keep up. how do you know the
guys a fundy anyway? Just because he's done the research and you
havent? Your a winner alright!

Research? He quoted some passages out of context.

Everything he quoted directly contradicted you what guys are saying so
that tells me that the guy has done his homework. you and jps haven't
shown how what he has quoted is out of context in anyway at all. That
tells me that you guys don't have a clue.

Anyone can quote passages in the bible. He provided no context. So, it seems
that you're the one who has a clue failure.

--
Nom=de=Plume