Oh, we had no trouble seeing the reflection from a short pulse train
pointed at the moon. We simply kept the repeater scanning
300-600-900-1200 on the 300 mile range, its maximum, until the pulse
showed up. Count the number of scans X 300 miles and add in the
repeater's range to that to get the moon's distance. The return was
quite strong.



On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 20:19:10 -0500, "Leanne" wrote:

I was thinking of moonbounce. The moon, I believe is -54db
passive reflector and with that power, there should have been a
bit coming back. Old Paul Wilson did it with a lot less on 2
mtrs.

Leanne

"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:30:49 -0500, "Leanne"
wrote:



Larry,
We those pulses a CQ????? :-p

Leanne W1WXS
s/v Fundy


Not enough power for SETI.
Larry W4CSC

NNNN



Larry W4CSC

NNNN