On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:19:39 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Canuck57" wrote in message
news
H the K wrote:
On 11/9/09 1:17 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
TopBassDog wrote:
Herr Krause. How does she irritate you so? You of all people seem to
find the former governor such a threat to you that you now claim her
to be a "dumb bitch." Evidently she is getting to you.

Keep it up, Sarah.

HK is intimidated by women. Scared ****less of them actually.


Hmm... he doesn't seem intimidated by me. He hasn't plonked me, but
others
have. I wonder what that means....


I would fear for this country if Palin achieved high national political
office, but not because she is a woman. In office, she is a dangerous,
simple-minded, pseudo-religious moron. I doubt any of that has to do with
her gender. After all, George W. Bush had the same symptoms.

So after a year of Obamanation you still think people are better off?

From my perspective, yes and no. We're better off strategically and in some
cases specifically, but we're less well off as far as things like
unemployment and deficit spending goes. The former is wildly more important,
but only in the long-term. The latter is wildly more inportant in the
short-term, but not so much in the long-term.

Obama cannot be credited with much of either. Not Bush is a big part
of the former and the economy is one he inherited.

He has an attractive personality and great outlook so he's definitely
helped the former. I hope his decision making helps the latter
recover more quickly than it would by natural means.