On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:45:23 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:09:52 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:52:30 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:03:22 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:07:26 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 4:59 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:47:07 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 2:28 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.



Lower life form? B.S. Cal disdains Republicans. That makes him smarter
than Republicans.

You're not only a PR person for your, cat, Harry - you're immitigably
sycophantic.

--


That's many steps up the evolutionary ladder from "conservative." If you
need evidence, you'll find it here, among the right-wing morons.

You surprise me again, Harry. It is the rare, informed 'progressive'
that will admit to an ascendant aspect to evolution.

Very rare indeed.

Most everything you write qualifies as smarmy.

Are you sure you're not rich? You certainly comport yourself as such.

Was Thales 'rich'?

Are you undergoing rhinoplasty to make yourself look like Bill
Buckley? You don't have his way with words, but you've got the smarmy
part down cold.

Maybe you could be one of those lookalikes they have in Hollywood if
you brushed up on your education.

Aren't familiar with Thales I presume? (Keywords that might work for
you: olive presses, Miletus, pre-socratics, star gazing...)

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access