BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Jim

Stevie wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:51:48 -0600, wrote:

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:45:08 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:41:34 -0600, wrote:

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:22:33 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:15:28 -0600, wrote:

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:54:59 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/2/09 2:29 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:19:11 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 2, 2:13 pm, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:56:36 -0500, H the

wrote:

On 11/2/09 1:43 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:30:26 -0500, H the

wrote:
On 11/2/09 1:16 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:03:36 -0500, H the

wrote:
On 11/2/09 12:31 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:08:48 -0500, H the

wrote:
On 11/2/09 12:05 PM, wrote:
Kroil Oil works exceptionally well on just about any
type of rusted or
frozen parts. You can purchased it directly from
Kano Labs in a spray
can, oil sqiurt can, or a closed container. If you
buy a packaged
kit, you can get all of these at a fairly inexpensive
price. It's the
only product that I would buy for our maintenance
department and
machine shop for that type of problem. I've been
able to apply it to
bolts that were siezed-up in machinery that had been
left in the
weather for years. The parts could be loosened
within 10 minutes.
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored
Newsgroup Service

-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored
Broadband Access
Very interesting and revealing. Thanks.
My inclination is to say that you're welcome. However,
I don't think
any cynicism that may inhere is baseless considering
your penchant for
denigrating others. In fact, I'd wager that you
suspect that you have
seredipitously stumbled upon information that you may
be able to
exploit in the future in your various campaigns of
character
assassination. Though, I think a thoroughly recondite
defense of my
unsolicited blurb in relying on what Desiderius Erasmus
described of
Sir Thomas More to parallel my own assorted vocations
may not be
beyond you. But, then again, perhaps it is. You can
always blame it
on my tortured 'prose,' if the latter is the case.
All cynicism aside, though, you're welcome.
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup
Service

-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored
Broadband Access
Nothing nefarious. Your far simpler language and simple
spelling errors
in the "Kroil post" tell me what I need to know.
You've deduced that I have the capacity to transpose
vowels on
occassion, and that I'm as apt to leave behind sloppy
editing as well?
Or is it that you've discovered that I can mingle well
with the
audience? Perhaps it reveals that I don't use a spell
checker? It
certainly couldn't be the case that I sometimes try to
squeeze notes
into a busy day. Whatever the case may be, Harry, I
think that you're
merely clever by half, even in your evaluations. Again,
perhaps I'm
just cynical.
(Perhaps I'm just a Slade devotee.)
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup
Service

-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored
Broadband Access
Your conclusions on my deductions are incorrect. Let's
just say that
any decent English teacher would be able to put together
an hilarious
class based upon your "fogged up" prose. Some of your
tortured prose
reads as if it were fed through an English language
complicator/mixmaster.
Serendipitously, indeed.
I suppose I'll have to refer to the Hodge's Harbrace when I
get home
to check the legitimacy of your "an hilarious"
construction. I can do
that in an hour, I think, over lunch. I don't know why I
don't keep a
"Harbrace" here at the office. Perhaps, it's that you're
falling back
on more esoteric usage to help 'clear' the air. I can
appreciate
that.
--
Esoteric? Those of us of a certain age who actually studied
English
formally learned that in speech "an" was used before a word
beginning
with an "h" if the first syllable of that word was
unstressed. The first
syllable of "hilarious" is unstressed. Another example,
perhaps more
familiar: "An" historian.
Surely your English language complicator/mixmaster "knows"
that.
, whether or not the h is silent.
As if! I'll trade you my English language
complicator/mixmaster for
your Wayback Machine.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband
Access- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
You've got to realize that if you don't believe, do, think and
act
like Harry, then in his eyes, you are to be mocked for
everything,
called names, insulted and lied about.
My suspicion is that Harry wants to showcase his 'exceptionalism.'
He's certainly free to do so. And I can employ my Rube Goldberg,
designer, English language complicator/mixmaster with the daring
alacrity of an impudent layman just as well. (I just have to
figure
out where to plug the darn thing in.) :)

--

Once again, your suspicions are wrong. If I wanted to "showcase"
my facility with the written language here, I could easily do
it. But there's no point. Newsgroups are for a written version
of conversational English, fast and informal.
Harry, what I stated is that my suspicion is that you want to
showcase
your "excpetionalism." That is not to imply that you are doing this
by an ostentatious display of your mastery of the English language.
That would be "an hilarious" inference on your part, if I may
abscond
with a trinket from your 'display'.
Harry has done well enough showcasing his achievements, possessions,
photography skills, and sexual prowess to impress the hell out of me.
He needn't waste time trying to impress with his mastery at
cut'n'pasting.
Actually, I somewhat surprised that he's continued with this dialogue
as long as he has. One would get the impression that he's almost
enjoying it. (And I sincerely doubt that it's out of the narcissistic
pleasure of engaging persons of a perceived lower caliber.)
He's enjoying the fact that someone is speaking to him without the use
of profanity. It's bound to be a strange experience.
Lol! I suppose that's where I have genuinely failed in my efforts at
dialogue. I just have to remind myself that nobody's perfect...

I disagree. Herring is a perfect ass.

It's that "an perfect ass"?

-S

It is proper English to call Krause an asshole, isn't it?