On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:41:26 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...
Let's look at this:

Bashing is a harsh, gratuitous, prejudicial attack on a person, group
or subject. Literally, bashing is a term meaning to hit or,
colloquially, to assault but when it is used as a suffix, or in
conjunction with a noun indicating the subject being attacked, it is
normally used to imply a sense of uncompromising vehemence and bigotry
about the assailant.

I posted a reference to a well publicized (they're bragging and WANT
everybody to know) book burning. If you see some sort of "harsh,
gratuitous, prejudicial attack" in noting that they could also be
roasting Smores..... I think somebody's skin is incredibly thin....

Be an equal oppourtunity basher, attaker and hater. You always single
out a specific group, fundamental christians, of which I am not a member
to provide full disclosure. If you professed hatred for all
fundementalist sects of all religions I wouldn't have a problem.

Having read Gene's rants, I assume that he thinks any fundamentalist,
regardless of religion, is a fool.

What makes you think he thinks poorly of only Christian
fundamentalists? It's really the only kind of fundamentalist we have
to deal with regularly here in the US.

They're all loons as far as I'm concerned.