On 10/30/09 8:02 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

"The Arctic is an early indicator of what we can expect at the global
scale as we move through the next few decades ... So we should be
paying attention to this very carefully," Barber said

Uh huh....

Welllllll.........

http://www.climatedepot.com/a/3515/P...global-warming

"Key Excerpt: Observations of the Sun show that as for the increase in
temperature, carbon dioxide is "not guilty" and as for what lies ahead
in the upcoming decades, it is not catastrophic warming, but a global,
and very prolonged, temperature drop."

Are we back to the ice age thing agian? Are we now going to be told to
burn everything to increase the temperature. Mr. Smith you are being
fined $2,500 for not burning enouh fossil fuel to keep the CO2 levels
high enough to sustain life during the coming ice age.

I was watching a show last night about the magnetite in lava and how it
orients it self to the magnetic poles before the lava hardens. I believe
we have more to worry about when the North and South poles switch, which
we are well over due to have occur. Some scientists say it is a process
and others say it can be like flipping a light switch.

What I am waiting for is the 5 or 6 category 5 hurricanes we still
should have between now and the end of November.




Why? You live well inland, and you don't have a boat to worry you. Do
high winds interfere with your lousy golf game?